CR1616 vs CR1632 Batteries: Technical Analysis and Application Guide
Lithium coin cell batteries CR1616 and CR1632 are widely used in compact electronics, but their subtle differences often lead to confusion. This article dissects their technical specifications, use cases, and critical compatibility considerations.
1. Core Specifications
CR1616
Dimensions: 16 mm (diameter) × 1.6 mm (height)
Voltage: 3V (Lithium manganese dioxide)
Capacity: 50–55 mAh
Weight: 1.2–1.5 grams
CR1632
Dimensions: 16 mm (diameter) × 3.2 mm (height)
Voltage: 3V (Same chemistry as CR1616)
Capacity: 120–130 mAh
Weight: 2.0–2.3 grams
2. Key Differences
Physical Compatibility
Shared Diameter: Both use 16mm-diameter compartments, enabling cross-fit in some devices.
Height Disparity: CR1632’s double the height (3.2mm vs 1.6mm) makes it physically incompatible with devices designed exclusively for CR1616.
Capacity and Runtime
CR1632 delivers ~2.4× the capacity of CR1616 (130mAh vs 55mAh), providing significantly longer runtime.
Example: In a car key fob, CR1632 lasts 2–3 years vs CR1616’s 1–1.5 years.
Energy Density
CR1632 achieves ~220 Wh/kg vs CR1616’s ~180 Wh/kg due to optimized internal structure.
3. Application Scenarios
CR1616 Preferred For
Ultra-thin devices:
Hearing aid peripherals
Miniature fitness trackers
Slim calculator/watch backups
Low-power sensors:
Temperature loggers (e.g., in shipping containers)
CR1632 Dominates In
High-drain applications:
Automotive key fobs (e.g., Tesla Model 3 key card)
Medical devices (glucose monitor transmitters)
IoT sensors with wireless connectivity (Bluetooth Low Energy)
4. Substitution Risks
Scenario | CR1616 in CR1632 Slot | CR1632 in CR1616 Slot |
---|---|---|
Physical Fit | Loose contact (risk of disconnection) | Impossible (3.2mm vs 1.6mm height) |
Performance | Rapid depletion (55mAh vs 130mAh) | N/A (Physical mismatch) |
Safety | Potential reverse polarity if improperly secured | Mechanical damage to device |
5. Cost and Availability
CR1616: $0.80–$1.20 per unit (lower demand)
CR1632: $0.50–$1.00 per unit (economies of scale from automotive use)
Lifespan Cost: CR1632’s longer runtime makes it 40–60% cheaper per operational year.
6. Environmental Considerations
Recycling: Both require specialized lithium battery recycling (not household bins).
Carbon Footprint: Producing one CR1632 emits ~8g CO?eq vs CR1616’s ~5g CO?eq.
7. Manufacturer Recommendations
Panasonic: Recommends CR1632 for “frequent-use” devices due to cycle resilience.
Sony: Warns against mixing CR1616/CR1632 in medical devices due to voltage drop risks.
8. Future Trends
Thin-Film Batteries: CR1616 may phase out as devices adopt flexible batteries (e.g., LG Chem’s 0.3mm cells).
Rechargeable Versions: No commercial Li-ion variants exist yet due to technical constraints.
9. Final Selection Guide
Choose CR1616 if:
Device thickness ≤1.8mm is mandatory.
Power needs are minimal (<0.1mA average current).
Choose CR1632 if:
Runtime is critical (e.g., keyless entry systems).
Device supports ≥3.0mm battery height.
Always verify your device’s battery compartment dimensions and voltage requirements. When in doubt, consult the manufacturer’s specifications—forcing an incompatible battery can damage both the device and battery.
Kevin Chen
Founder / Writer at Rantle East Electronic Trading Co.,Limited
I am Kevin Chen, I graduated from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in 2000. I am an electrical and electronic engineer with 23 years of experience, in charge of writting content for ICRFQ. I am willing use my experiences to create reliable and necessary electronic information to help our readers. We welcome readers to engage with us on various topics related to electronics such as IC chips, Diode, Transistor, Module, Relay, opticalcoupler, Connectors etc. Please feel free to share your thoughts and questions on these subjects with us. We look forward to hearing from you!